Skip to main content

Tired: 10x Developers. Wired: 10x ENVIRONMENTS.

The mythological 10x developer, seen here in its natural habitat.
image: the mythological 10x developer, caught in its natural habitat.

A 10x developer thread blew up on Twitter over the weekend. A startup/disrupter posted their tips on how to find the mythological 10x engineer and what massive rewards your organization will reap by having one.

Unfortunately, their "tips" only amounted to the perpetuation of a very different type of engineer: one who can't mentor, can't be bothered to attend a meeting, knows only code (to the detriment of all other soft skills), and will insist on doing things the right way...aka their way.

In short, it was a list of attributes that described a toxic developer.

After having slung code for two decades...and am now charged with leading my own team of developers...here is the harsh truth of the matter:

If you want to build a team of highly productive developers, focus on building a 10x environment.


  • Build knowledge sharing into your process, so your team is actively invested in educating (read: mentoring) each other in how to better collaborate/solve problems together. Think: code reviews, retrospectives, team-led showcases, etc.
  • Use meetings judiciously. What's the agenda? Who are all these people on the invite? Can these questions be resolved in a quick email?
  • Drop the "methodology theater." If your team agrees to Scrum, then do it. Saying you're "Agile" while blindly ignoring the rules of the road only serves to disabuse your team further.
  • If you "get what you measure", then start measuring healthy habits. For example, what percentage of your team's work went over 40 hours last week? How many weeks in a row has your team been able to avoid having to work on the weekend?

Yes, 10x developers exist. I've worked with many. And while not all are a challenge to manage in a team, most are. They can be both equally gifted and frustrating, and any short-term gains you may realize will most certainly become liabilities in the long run. Our energy is better spent taking the talented and creative people we have and help them make the leap to 10x by removing the daily barriers of the foolish modern work environment -- an environment which, left untouched, will surely transform them into a demotivated mess.
Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

Sad Stories

How are you measuring the quality of your product management? Is it: How accurately you adhere to Scrum?  How close your velocity matches your SLO?  The number of bugs fixed in this sprint? None. of. this. matters. A surface level review of these metrics would seem to matter to folks desperate to boast about their Agile compliance, while failing to remember the first edict of the manifesto : Individuals and interactions over processes and tools A recent tweet reminded of this: Wow! I reported a unicode issue affecting URLs to 2 different commercial software companies. One responded in 4 days indicating it'll be fixed in a yet-to-be released new version (which requires more $$$); the other provided a working patch in less than 3 hours. — James Moberg (@gamesover) June 18, 2019 While I can't comment on what specific bottleneck is separating these two companies, I understand (all too well) the side-effect of throwing everything into a Scrum bucket. Af...
Read more

How Do I Use Myers-Briggs To Assess My Team?

Question: How do I use Myers-Briggs to Assess My Team? Answer: You don't. Seriously. That's my answer.  Don't do it. Still reading? (sigh) Alright, if we're going to do this dance, let's get it over with. Myers-Briggs is Junk Science When a hypothesis is tested in a controlled experiment, proven, and those results are vetted by independent peers, you have yourself a little thing we like to call scientific evidence. Leave any of these on the table (eg. you make a hypothesis but don't run an experiment), all you have is opinion . The missing piece in Myers-Briggs (or MBTI) is that last part: independent verification by peers . Scientists uninvolved in the hypothesis need to be able to reproduce the experiments and put their career on the line by saying, "Yeah, this other scientist I don't know anything about...they're 100% correct." The only "verification" that Myers-Briggs has is via the Center for the Application...
Read more